First, sepsis is a syndrome and not an individual disease. It is the 11th leading cause of death in the US. According to the Global Sepsis Alliance (GSA), “Sepsis is one of the most pressing healthcare challenges faced by the world today.”  The CDC shows sepsis hospital admissions “have grown from around 200 per 1000 inhabitants in 2000, to 340 in 2008. Also, in 2008 the costs for hospital treatment were US $14.8 billion, but these have increased by an annual rate of 11 percent.” According to Dr. Reinhardt “the main way it can be prevented is if it is recognized early and the patient receives adequate measures of treatment. Treatments, like antimicrobials and intravenous fluids must be initiated when the first signs of organ dysfunction appear. If they are given in the first few hours the survival rate may be up to 80 percent, but studies suggest with each hour of delay the mortality rate increases by five to eight percent.” (GSA – Stop Sepsis, Save Lives)


Sepsis is a potentially deadly medical condition characterized by a whole-body inflammatory state (called a systemic inflammatory response syndrome or SIRS) that is triggered by an infection. The body may develop this inflammatory response by the immune system to microbes in the blood, urine, lungs, skin, or other tissues. A popular term for sepsis is blood poisoning. Severe sepsis is the systemic inflammatory response, infection and the presence of organ dysfunction. Septic Shock is the combination of sepsis with abnormally decreased blood pressure.

(Also, here is another great video about SIRS from the same source.)


At this point in time, the literature richly illustrates that no single mediator / system / pathway / pathogen drives the pathophysiology of sepsis (Am J Pathol. 2007 May; 170(5): 1435–1444. doi:10.2353/ajpath.2007.060872Pathophysiology of Sepsis)

  • The basic pathophysiology of sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock includes:
    • Vasodilation
    • Third spacing due to capillary leak
    • Myocardial dysfunction.
  • Vascular endothelium is both a source and target of injury in SIRS / sepsis. Injury may be due to toxins such as LPS (endotoxin) or from ischemia itself. Tissue factor release leads to amplification of the inflammatory response and to DIC via the thrombin pathway. Thrombin not only catalyzes fibrin formation but also causes leukocyte adhesion which leads to further endothelial damage. As DIC progresses, clotting factors are consumed and bleeding occurs.
  • Clotting factors, pro-fibrinolytic, and anti-thrombin factors are consumed leading to loss of fibrinolysis & normal down-regulation of thrombin pathway. This phenomenon is both pro-inflammatory and pro-thrombotic.
  • Protein C depletion has been associated with increased mortality. This has led to a series of clinical trials utilizing protein C, activated protein C (APC), antithrombin III (AT-III), and tissue factor pathway inhibitor to try and disrupt this cycle. Activated protein C has in fact been shown to reduce mortality in severe sepsis in adults. Bleeding problems seems to outweigh the benefits in children.
  • Usually gram negative and usually originating in the urinary or respiratory systems
  • Frequent microbial causes of sepsis



(Balk RA. Crit Care Clin 2000;16:337-52Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2008 SSC Guidelines)




These measures can help improve immunohomeostasis (pro/antiinflamatory mediators), improve coagulation response with decreased organ thrombosis, and provide mechanical support for organ perfusion during an acute episode, and may buy some time, but may or may not reduce mortality.






Dr. Emmanuel Rivers gave a talk on Severe Sepsis Management via the EMCrit Blog. The talk is broken down into the three links to each of the episodes provided below.


In addition, here are some more great resources related to sepsis.

  1. Advances in Sepsis
  2. Crashing Patient Severe Sepsis
  3. Development and Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Sepsis Protocol
  4. EMCrit – Severe Sepsis Resources*
  5. EM Guidlines – Sepsis
  6. Global Sepsis Alliance
  7. International Sepsis Forum
  8. MedicineNet – Sepsis
  9. Medline Sepsis
  10. Sepsis Alliance
  11. Sepsis know from day 1
  12. Stanford SOM – Septris
  13. Surviving Sepsis
    1. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) was developed by the European Society of Critical Care Medicine, the International Sepsis Forum,and the Society of Critical Care Medicine, to help meet the challenges of sepsis and to improve its management, diagnosis, and treatment. The agreement between the three founding organizations and funding for the campaign was concluded December 31, 2008. A generous grant has been received to continue the important work of the campaign. The grant funding extends through 2013. Assistance for US hospitals interested in implementing the bundles can be obtained through the Society of Critical Care Medicine’s Paragon program.
    2. Surviving Sepsis Protocol Checklist

Additional References

  1. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis De?nitions Conference
  2. Cleveland Clinic – Sepsis
  3. Genetic Polymorphisms in Sepsis and Septic Shock:Role in Prognosis and Potential for Therapy
  4. New Approaches to Sepsis: Molecular Diagnostics and Biomarkers
  5. Role of oxygen debt in the development of organ failure sepsis, and death in high-risk surgical patients
  6. Oxidative stress as a novel target in pediatric sepsis management
  7. The Pathogenesis of Sepsis
  8. Rapid Treatment of Severe Sepsis
  9. Sepsis in cirrhosis: report on the 7th meeting of the International Ascites Club
  10. Thermo Scientific biomarker procalcitonin
  11. Time is tissue: Why emerging evidence on sepsis urges physicians to watch the clock 
    Early volume resuscitation can help avoid organ dysfunction—if you act quickly after making a diagnosis


Sepsis poses a significant burden upon the US healthcare system, resulting in an estimated 750,000 hospital admissions, 570,000 Emergency Department visits, 200,000 deaths and $16.7 billion in medical expenditures annually, according to, the online journal article in PLOS ONE, Chronic Medical Conditions and Risk of Sepsis. Mortality rates remain high in severe sepsis, and despite recent therapeutic breakthroughs much remains to be done to advance our understanding and treatment of sepsis. Currently, anti-sepsis initiatives focus on acute care, with ED staff employing the “sepsis bundles,” a series of steps that includes aggressive administration of antibiotics, IV fluids and blood pressure-boosting medications, and management. Additionally, the  Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2012 guidelines will further suggest that in patients with elevated lactate levels as a marker of hypoperfusion, resuscitation should be targeted at normalizing lactate as rapidly as possible (grade 2C). Having said that, however, a normal lactate doesn’t indicate absence of shock. Other factors, such as the patient’s central venous oxygen saturation level, need to be considered as well. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines are sponsored by 27 medical organizations. Among them are the Society of Critical Care Medicine, ACEP, the Society of Hospital Medicine, the American College of Chest Physicians, the American Thoracic Society, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Surgical Infection Society, the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators, and a host of international groups. Hopefully, strategies will be developed to continue to improve and maximize our efforts towards ameliorating sepsis throughout the world.


3 thoughts on “Sepsis

  1. gayle

    My husband, a retired Centers for Disease Control research scientist (virologist), died of sepsis at Emory University Hospital in Atlanta, GA last year. After being diagnosed and admitted through the ER into the hospital for an infection (cellulitis in both legs and white count that had fallen from 8,500 to 800 in 24 hours), Joe went all night without treatment, even as I asked everyone who entered his room for antibiotics. A tired and distracted ER Resident, a less than thorough ER nurse (checked NO to using the “Sepsis Tool”), and a night nurse who failed to read the STAT antibiotic orders from the Hospital Resident resulted in a fatal breakdown in communication. Joe was moved through a disconnected and broken system – a situation that is actually very common for patients. My husband had medical mistakes almost every time he entered the medical system. In fact, his poor health was due to a terrible medical mistake that was made in 2001 in a different hospital. Three different opportunities to treat Joe’s sepsis at Emory were missed. In addition, the Hospital resident who prescribed the STAT orders many hours after Joe was admitted prescribed a broad spectrum antibiotic, Vancomycin used for gram positive microbes, never considering a gram negative. It was gram negative. This points to a systemic problem that Emory has with sepsis diagnosis and treatment. Failure to use protocol in so many areas ensured Joe would progress to septic shock and die in the ICU by that night.

    Emory’s Assistant Director of Critical Care is on the Executive board of the International “Surviving Sepsis Campaign”. It’s disturbing that the protocol put in place for sepsis at the administrative level of the hospital doesn’t filter down to the personnel who actually provide direct patient care. None of the patient care personnel even realized they made a mistake until I researched this for months and launched a Medicare complaint. Why are sepsis deaths not reviewed until loved ones begin to ask pointed questions? Sepsis deaths deserve at least a cursory review to see if mistakes in protocol and recognition are made. Personnel who make those errors should be informed and retrained with an emphasis on not repeating those errors. This takes physician time, but then the medical time that is spent on sepsis and septic shock is not substantial, and the money spent on these infections that devastate and kill patients is the real economic drain on healthcare dollars.

    Nothing will ever change until hospitals are serious about reducing their sepsis rate, and this rate can only be reduced by the cooperation of the personnel who provide direct patient care. My husband was an internationally renowned pox virologist with a PhD in microbiology who ran the Pox Virus Lab and later set up the CDC Proteomics Lab. His meticulous approach in the world of scientific research was completely different from the lack of interest in precision and excellence that patients experience in our hospitals. Physicians could lear nmuch from the true peer review and the questioning attitude that research scientists bring to their work.

  2. Tory Pereira

    Hey Jeremy! My name is Tory Pereira and I am a sepsis survivor. I have enjoyed reading your blog, you have presented a lot of good sepsis facts! I did not know what sepsis even was until I went into septic shock at the beginning of February 2016. Since my 25 day hospital stay, I have now been learning and reading about sepsis non-stop! I have created a blog to share my story, and I am creating a nonprofit organization to raise awareness of sepsis in hopes to reduce the yearly fatalities. I will continue to revisit your page because you have a lot of good facts that I didn’t even know. If you would like to hear a crazy story of a near-death sepsis experience, please check out my blog at! Thank you so much, and have a great day!

  3. Pingback: Jeremy Jaramillo’s Blog – SEPSIS | the SILVERBIRD8

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s